| Subject: FOLLOW-UP: Nearly 28,000 Witnesses Are Still Waiting – MCMC’s Silence and the Missing “Evidence” Sent to ICANN (Case #01448650 / malaysia.build)
Dear Minister,
I wrote to you on 9 April 2026. It is now 15 April 2026. The CC list – including Sarawak State Government, Wisma Putra, KPDN, BHEUU, Bank Negara, and the Prime Minister’s Department – has been copied on both emails.
To date, I have received no reply from your office. MCMC has also not replied.
Nearly 28,000 witnesses are now watching. The NamePros thread documenting my case has surpassed 27,900 views and is approaching 28,000. The thread is permanent. The world is watching.
The Core Question – Does MCMC’s Letter to ICANN Exist?
MCMC has publicly stated that they wrote to ICANN regarding my case (Case #01448650 / malaysia.build). To date, they have provided no evidence:
| Missing Evidence |
Status |
| Date of the letter |
❌ Not provided |
| Recipient name and title |
❌ Not provided |
| Specific questions asked |
❌ Not provided |
| ICANN’s response (if any) |
❌ Not provided |
| Any proof of engagement at all |
❌ Not provided |
I respectfully ask again: does this letter actually exist?
- If yes – please direct MCMC to provide the evidence. A redacted copy is acceptable. But provide proof that MCMC is not telling lies.
- If no – then MCMC made a false statement to a citizen. That is not incompetence. That is misconduct. The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) and the Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission (EAIC) will need to review this.
The Deadline Was Given. The Deadline Was Passed. Silence Continues.
On 5 April 2026, I sent an email to MCMC. I gave them 72 hours to respond to my requests – including providing evidence of their claimed letter to ICANN.
That deadline passed on 8 April 2026 at 24:00.
To date – 7 days after the deadline – MCMC has not replied. Not a single word. Not an acknowledgment. Not an extension. Not a denial. Nothing.
| Event |
Date |
Status |
| Email sent to MCMC with 72-hour deadline |
5 April 2026 |
✅ Sent |
| Deadline for MCMC to respond |
8 April 2026, 24:00 |
❌ PASSED |
| Days since deadline passed |
7 days |
❌ STILL NO REPLY |
A citizen gives a regulator a deadline. The regulator ignores it. The deadline passes. The regulator remains silent. Days become weeks.
This is not how a functioning regulatory body operates. This is not how Malaysia treats its citizens.
The Public Record – Nearly 28,000 Witnesses Have Seen the Admission
Minister, I respectfully draw your attention to the public record that has been established on NamePros, the largest domain industry forum in the world.
I invite you and all officials copied on this email to visit:
https://www.namepros.com/threads/is-your-domain-truly-secure-my-experience-raises-serious-questions.1362731/page-19#post-9599710
At this link, you will find:
| Documented Fact |
What It Means |
| An “expert” in the thread publicly admitted that my case fits the definition of scam = deception + financial gain. |
This is not my allegation. This is an admission from within the industry itself. |
| A community member – a neutral observer – pointed to my case and used the word “fraud.” |
The NamePros moderator approved that post. The platform has spoken. The record is sealed. |
| The view count on NamePros is now nearly 28,000. |
Nearly 28,000 industry professionals, regulators, and journalists have seen the evidence. The thread is permanent. The world is watching. |
This is not a private dispute. This is a public record.
The industry has admitted the scam. A community member has called it fraud. The platform has approved the post. And nearly 28,000 witnesses have seen it.
MCMC’s silence – and your Ministry’s silence – is now part of that same public record.
The Timeline of Silence – Complete Record
| Event |
Date |
Status |
| Multiple emails sent to MCMC over 95+ days |
Prior to April 2026 |
❌ Ignored |
| Personal visit to MCMC Sibu branch |
Prior to April 2026 |
✅ Documented (citizen had to visit in person) |
| Email sent to MCMC with 72-hour deadline |
5 April 2026 |
✅ Sent |
| Deadline for MCMC to respond |
8 April 2026, 24:00 |
❌ PASSED – NO REPLY |
| Original email sent to you (Minister) |
9 April 2026 |
✅ Sent |
| Follow-up email (this email) |
15 April 2026 |
✅ Sent |
| Your reply |
Pending |
⏳ Waiting |
| MCMC’s reply |
Pending |
⏳ Waiting (deadline passed 7 days ago) |
A citizen should not have to visit a regulator’s office in person to get a response. A citizen should not have to set deadlines that are ignored. A citizen should not have to send multiple follow-up emails to a Minister. A citizen should not have to watch nearly 28,000 witnesses gather while their own government remains silent.
What I Respectfully Request from You
| Request |
Why It Matters |
| Direct MCMC to provide the evidence of their engagement with ICANN – date, recipient, questions asked, and ICANN’s response. |
If the letter exists, show it. If not, the public deserves to know. |
| Direct MCMC to answer: will they issue a non-objection letter for malaysia.build? Yes or No? |
A simple question. A simple answer. Silence is not acceptable. |
| Direct MCMC to explain why their GAC representatives sat silent at ICANN85 while my case was discussed and I was mocked. |
The world saw their absence. The world is asking why. |
| Clarify why MCMC has not answered any of my requests after 95+ days – and why they ignored the 72-hour deadline I set on 5 April 2026. |
Nearly 28,000 witnesses are watching. The silence is damaging Malaysia’s reputation. |
The Cost to Malaysia’s Face (Maruah Negara)
Minister, the world is watching. The NamePros thread has nearly 28,000 views and climbing.
A US attorney publicly claimed to speak for Malaysia BUT MCMC said nothing. The world interpreted silence as endorsement.
What message does this send to the world? That Malaysia does not defend its citizens? That Malaysia is weak? That Malaysia hides behind a process while its name is used without permission? That a regulator can ignore a citizen’s deadline with no consequence?
Is that the face Malaysia wants to show the world?
A Final Clarification on Responsibility
Minister, let me be clear on one point.
I have done my part. I have documented the evidence. I have filed the complaints. I have followed every process available to a Malaysian citizen. I have set deadlines that were ignored. I have sent multiple emails to your office and to MCMC.
If MCMC continues to remain silent – and if your Ministry continues to refuse to engage – the damage to Malaysia’s “maruah negara,” sovereignty, dignity, and global image will not be on me.
It will be on MCMC. It will be on the Ministry that refused to answer. It will be on the silence that could have been broken but was not.
I have done everything a citizen can do. The rest is in your hands.
Closing
Minister, I respectfully request your urgent clarification and intervention. The silence from MCMC is not just failing me – it is failing Malaysia.
I prefer to resolve this within your Ministry. But I am committed to ensuring that the principle of “Amanah” (Trust) in Malaysian public service is upheld.
MCMC were given a deadline. They ignored it. The deadline passed 7+ days ago. They have still not replied.
Our country’s “maruah negara,” sovereignty, honor, and global standing are at stake.
I look forward to your response.
Yours faithfully,
Wong Tai Chiew
Malaysian Citizen | Taxpayer
Namecheap Ticket ID: NC-UWS-6390
ICANN Compliance Case: #01448650
Public Record: https://loss.co
NamePros Thread: Nearly 28,000 witnesses and climbing
P.S. – CC List for Transparency and Oversight
The following offices have been copied on this email:
| Ministry / Office |
Purpose of Oversight |
| Minister of Digital – YB Gobind Singh Deo |
Oversight of Malaysia’s digital economy and data sovereignty |
| Minister of Housing and Local Government (KPKT) – YB Nga Kor Ming |
Relevance to the real estate and construction industry platform (malaysia.build) |
| Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Wisma Putra) |
Diplomatic implications of Malaysia’s representation (or lack thereof) at ICANN85 |
| Minister of Domestic Trade and Cost of Living (KPDN) |
Consumer protection regarding 10-year payment retention and “entrapment” by foreign registrars |
| Legal Affairs Division (BHEUU), Prime Minister’s Department |
Matters involving national sovereignty (kedaulatan negara) and legal accountability |
| Bank Negara Malaysia |
Financial and payment implications regarding the 10-year payment retention and FPX payment gateway integration |
| Sarawak State Government |
The domain owner is a citizen of Sarawak. The orangutan – a symbol of Sarawak – was mocked. This office is copied to ensure that the heritage and dignity of Sarawak are not ignored. |
P.P.S. – Key URLs for Your Reference
P.P.P.S. – A Final Note
Minister, I do not write to you as an adversary. I write to you as a Malaysian citizen and a taxpayer who believes that his government is capable of accountability.
Nearly 28,000 witnesses are watching. The world is watching. Sarawak is watching. Bank Negara is watching.
MCMC was given a deadline of 8 April 2026, 24:00. They ignored it. 7 days later, they are still silent.
Silence is the worst response of all you can do. From my perspective, MCMC’s failure to respond to a documented forensic audit of this scale raises serious questions about “Amanah” and whether taxpayer funds are being used effectively to protect Malaysian digital interests.
Please ask MCMC: does the letter exist? And why was the deadline ignored?
If MCMC and the Ministry continue to remain silent, then my own country’s regulatory bodies are no different from the parties: Namecheap, eNom, .BUILD Registry, ICANN – all silent.
The verdict? Totally NO accountability.
Then what is the point of MCMC’s existence?
If you do not agree with me, at least send me an email to update me on the progress or status. Silence is the worst response of all.
|
